Once again I strongly believe that blindly drive under bit's chains pressure
is not a smart way of 23-rd problem development of USE's in Informatics.
Almost any case been treated with bit's chains might be converted to 08/2016
system's design. Otherwise, Mapping Method utilising pairs for establishing
connection between equations of system would solve the problem with no issues at all.
Solution provided by Informatick BU on snapshot below
Stream 51 2019 (2 hr 32 min )
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bzaBV7GkW74
System itself
Here we intend to convert system above to equivalent with minimal knowledge of Boolean Algebra
(x10=>x9)=>(x8=>x7)=1
(x8=>x7)=>(x6=>x5)=1
(x6=>x5)=>(x4=>x3)=1
(x4=>x3)=>(x2=>x1)=1
Generation simplest 08/2016 style chart for converted system
Now consider
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=2844&v=0Aq8fell3gE&feature=emb_logo
( 51 min )
Consider two following systems
(1)
(x1=>x2)^(x2=>x3)^(x3=>x4)^(x4=>x5)=1
(y1=>y2)^(y2=>y3)^(y3=>y4)^(y4=>y5)=1
(z1=>z2)^(z2=>z3)^(z3=>z4)^(z4=>z5)=1
x2 v y2 v z2=1
(2)
(x1=>x2)^(x2=>x3)^(x3=>x4)^(x4=>x5)=1
(y1=>y2)^(y2=>y3)^(y3=>y4)^(y4=>y5)=1
(z1=>z2)^(z2=>z3)^(z3=>z4)^(z4=>z5)=1
x2 v y3 v z4=1
is not a smart way of 23-rd problem development of USE's in Informatics.
Almost any case been treated with bit's chains might be converted to 08/2016
system's design. Otherwise, Mapping Method utilising pairs for establishing
connection between equations of system would solve the problem with no issues at all.
Solution provided by Informatick BU on snapshot below
Stream 51 2019 (2 hr 32 min )
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bzaBV7GkW74
System itself
Here we intend to convert system above to equivalent with minimal knowledge of Boolean Algebra
(x10=>x9)=>(x8=>x7)=1
(x8=>x7)=>(x6=>x5)=1
(x6=>x5)=>(x4=>x3)=1
(x4=>x3)=>(x2=>x1)=1
Generation simplest 08/2016 style chart for converted system
Now consider
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=2844&v=0Aq8fell3gE&feature=emb_logo
( 51 min )
Consider two following systems
(1)
(x1=>x2)^(x2=>x3)^(x3=>x4)^(x4=>x5)=1
(y1=>y2)^(y2=>y3)^(y3=>y4)^(y4=>y5)=1
(z1=>z2)^(z2=>z3)^(z3=>z4)^(z4=>z5)=1
x2 v y2 v z2=1
(2)
(x1=>x2)^(x2=>x3)^(x3=>x4)^(x4=>x5)=1
(y1=>y2)^(y2=>y3)^(y3=>y4)^(y4=>y5)=1
(z1=>z2)^(z2=>z3)^(z3=>z4)^(z4=>z5)=1
x2 v y3 v z4=1
No comments:
Post a Comment